See whether the 10-day audit fits.

Answer six non-confidential questions about product state, decision timing, ownership, and access. The result is calculated in this browser and creates a call brief your team can inspect before contacting Nuraforge.

Audit readiness

Choose the closest answer. Do not include source code, credentials, patient information, export-controlled information, or other confidential details.

1. What exists today? Target hardware, source, and a reproducible build exist.The audit can inspect the system as it is intended to run. Hardware and source exist, but build or access has gaps.The first step would be closing the missing-access boundary. The product is still at concept or architecture stage.A code-and-hardware audit is premature.

2. What decision is ahead? Verification, pilot, production, or release.A named milestone can define the audit’s decision boundary. Architecture or implementation.The audit may fit if working assets and a specific decision exist. General exploration.An open question is not yet a bounded diagnostic.

3. When must the decision be made? Within 90 days.The result can still change near-term engineering sequence. Within six months.The audit can support planning if the product state is stable enough to inspect. No committed timeline.Readiness work may be more useful than a paid risk audit.

4. How clear is the problem? Several firmware risks may change the milestone plan.The team needs evidence, priority, and sequence. A failure area is known, but cause or impact is not.A narrower diagnostic scope may fit. The exact fix and acceptance condition are known.Direct implementation is likely more appropriate.

5. Who owns the decision? A technical owner and business sponsor are identified.Both engineering evidence and business consequence can be resolved. A technical owner is identified; sponsorship is unclear.Internal approval may be the next dependency. No decision owner is identified.The audit would have no accountable recipient.

6. Can agreed access be ready? Repository, build, hardware, and owner access can be ready.The ten-business-day clock can have a clear trigger. Some access is ready; material gaps remain.Scope and start conditions need clarification. Required code, hardware, or owner access cannot be provided.The audit cannot make evidence-backed findings without inspectable inputs.

Primary firmware risk

Choose a category only. Do not describe the confidential implementation.

I have not entered confidential or regulated information.

This local scorecard needs JavaScript to calculate a result. You can still review the assessment or send an inquiry.

See whether the 10-day audit fits.

Audit readiness

Result pending

Non-confidential decision brief